Category: iGame

(AsiaGameHub) - The National Gambling Board (NGB) launched a brand-new online verification portal on Wednesday, which is designed to compile a full list of all gambling operators licensed in South Africa. This initiative is part of a wider campaign to curb illegal gambling activities and guide consumers toward authorized, properly regulated operators. Accessible via the NGB’s official website, this portal was developed in partnership with provincial licensing authorities (PLAs). It includes a searchable directory of every legally licensed land-based and online gambling operator across the country. This database will be regularly updated and made available to the general public, law enforcement agencies, tax authorities, and financial institutions. Only gambling operators listed on this portal hold the legal authorization to offer gambling services in South Africa. A ‘critical step’ for safeguarding in South Africa Lungile Dukwana, the acting CEO of the NGB, highlighted the critical importance of this platform in protecting South African citizens from the risks tied to illegal gambling. “This platform represents a critical step forward in shielding South Africans from the dangers posed by illegal gambling,” Dukwana stated. He emphasized that the register offers a trusted resource for verifying licensed gambling operators, and allows consumers to participate in gambling activities within a safe, regulated environment. “It gives the public a reliable tool to confirm licensed gambling operators, ensures that anyone who chooses to gamble can do so in a secure, regulated space, and strengthens oversight and accountability across the gambling industry.” This verification tool also aims to improve oversight and accountability within the gambling sector. Taxes and wagering increases South Africa is Africa’s largest regulated gambling market, overseen by both provincial and national regulatory bodies. According to the NGB, 1.5 trillion South African rand (equivalent to $89 billion) was wagered across the country during the 2024/2025 financial year, marking a 31.3% increase from the prior financial year. However, the regulatory framework has struggled to keep pace with the growth of cross-border online gambling and offshore betting sites that target South African players without proper authorization. This strain has been underscored by a recent Gauteng High Court ruling, which reaffirmed that online casinos remain illegal under current national law. The ruling also highlighted inconsistencies in provincial enforcement and the widening gap between existing legislation and the realities of the digital marketplace. The country is currently considering a 20% tax on gross gaming revenue. This proposal has sparked controversy, with a spokesperson from the Free Market Foundation (FMF) telling iGB that “The likely result is that more users will be driven to offshore online casinos, which operate outside the existing regulatory regime and do not pay gambling taxes.” A crackdown on the unlicensed Illegal and offshore gambling continue to present significant challenges for South African regulators. The South African Bookmakers Association (SABA) recently reported that 62% of online gambling activity in South Africa comes from unlicensed operators. The NGB’s portal is designed to boost visibility and consumer awareness by encouraging people to verify an operator’s credentials before placing bets. “We are not encouraging gambling beyond recreational use, but rather promoting informed and responsible participation for those who choose to engage in it,” Dukwana explained. The board also emphasized consumer protection, noting that gambling through licensed operators guarantees access to dispute resolution mechanisms, ensures adherence to responsible gambling protocols, and complies with anti-money laundering requirements. The NGB has announced plans to collaborate with financial institutions to use this verification list, helping authorities prevent unlicensed operators from facilitating transactions through South African banks and payment providers. Kathryn EvansKathryn reports on concise breaking news, with a primary focus on EMEA and U.S. legislation. A proud native of North Wales, fluent Welsh speaker, and lifelong Wrexham FC supporter – long before Hollywood came calling. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Mexico’s 50% GGR tax increase risks fueling growth in the black market, the nation’s top trade association has warned. Starting January 1 of this year, gambling operators in Mexico will face a heavier tax burden after the government approved a 50% GGR tax rate as part of the 2026 fiscal reform package. Miguel Ángel Ochoa Sánchez, president of the Mexican Association for Permit Holders, Operators and Suppliers of the Entertainment and Gambling Industry (AIEJA), told iGB in a recent interview that the tax hike came as a “blow” to the industry. He also warned that this tax increase aligns with a broader trend across the Latin American region, where higher rates ultimately hinder efforts to direct gamblers toward licensed, legal services. “I think the primary risk posed by the growing wave of industry tax hikes being adopted by many Latin American governments is that they will end up harming legitimate, licensed operators while benefiting the illicit market,” Ochoa told iGB. “Beyond harming businesses in the gambling sector, governments will actually collect less tax revenue by raising rates, which will drive a large number of players to unregulated platforms. These sites not only do not contribute to national public funds but also provide absolutely no consumer protection whatsoever,” Mexico market still an attractive one Even with his warnings about the tax increase, Ochoa still holds an optimistic view of Mexico’s gambling market. Mexico is a co-host of the upcoming FIFA World Cup, and Ochoa believes this event will present a major opportunity for the country’s gambling industry. “The market continues to expand quickly, and the outlook remains extremely positive,” Ochoa added. “With the 2026 World Cup underway, industry projections point to a significant rise not just in the number of bettors but also in medium-term player retention rates.” “Therefore, I believe we should keep the impact of this tax hike on the online sector’s growth in proper perspective,” Per the latest data from H2 Gambling Capital, Mexico ranks as the 18th largest market for the firm, with a gross gaming win of $5.68 billion in 2024. Playtech also expressed confidence in Mexico’s market in its recent FY25 earnings report, noting that it anticipates growth in its Americas region driven by the World Cup. Playtech has a partnership with Mexico-focused operator Caliente, and during the company’s post-FY25 earnings call, CFO and director Chris McGinnis stated: “In Mexico, Caliente continues to perform strongly, and we expect to see a further uplift from the 2026 FIFA World Cup, as Mexico is a co-host nation and all matches will be played in local time zones. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime event that will greatly boost visibility, user engagement and overall betting volumes.” Kyle GoldsmithKyle Goldsmith has been with Clarion since December 2023, joining after working in sports journalism, and has since gone on to serve as a senior LatAm-focused reporter for iGB. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has announced a provisional allocation of £25.4 million to fund gambling-harm prevention and resilience programs for the two-year period spanning 2026 to 2028. This new funding follows the implementation of a statutory levy, which replaced the previous voluntary system in April of last year. Through this levy, 33 voluntary, community, and social enterprise (VCSE) groups across England will be granted funds to carry out research and preventative initiatives. So far, the levy has generated nearly £120 million in total funds. A statement from the DHSC indicated that the money is intended to maintain and broaden prevention efforts led by third-sector organizations. It also aims to strengthen their capacity for long-term project management. The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID), which is now responsible for managing the distribution of statutory levy funds, noted that these allocations were determined following a closed application window that took place in January and February 2026. The selection process followed rigorous eligibility and scoring standards and included comprehensive due-diligence assessments. OHID required all participating organizations to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to commit to ending any direct financial support from the gambling industry, though social lotteries and the National Lottery are exempt from this rule. Furthermore, applicants were instructed to reassess any materials or methodologies they had previously used that were funded by organizations like GambleAware under the old voluntary levy system. GamCare included among funded charities The provisional list of recipients features a diverse array of organizations, ranging from major national gambling charities and educational trusts to community groups and local advice centers. Key provisional funding amounts include: GamCare: £4.04 million. Young Gamers and Gamblers Education Trust (YGAM): £3.0 million. Betknowmore: £2.99 million. BetBlocker: £1.12 million. Various Citizens Advice branches and regional VCSE groups: receiving grants ranging from roughly £140,000 to £1.3 million. The largest provisional grant was awarded to GamCare. The charity, which operates the National Gambling Helpline, recently highlighted data showing that students who gamble are losing an average of £50 per week. The department stated that these grants are meant to encourage "equitable and innovative prevention strategies" while improving the ability of VCSE organizations to maintain sustainable initiatives. £12 million designated for upper-tier local authorities OHID pointed out that these figures are currently provisional and will be finalized through formal grant agreements. Consequently, the names of recipients and the specific amounts awarded may change. In addition to the £25.4 million fund, the department announced a separate distribution of £12 million from the statutory levy to support upper-tier local authorities during the 2026-27 financial year. These local authority funds are earmarked for community-level gambling-harm reduction and prevention efforts. Meanwhile, NHS England has overseen a separate VCSE grant specifically for treatment-related services. The requirement for successful applicants to stop accepting direct industry funding by April 2026 is intended to address independence concerns. Awards will be officially confirmed once organizations complete their final grant agreements. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - On April 5th, authorities in Cambodia conducted a raid on the Gang Dao Casino in Preah Sihanouk, which was suspected of housing an online scam operation. According to the Commercial Gambling Management Commission, police confiscated approximately 500 computers and over 1,000 mobile phones believed to be utilized in the illicit activities. The operation led to the detention of 108 individuals, after which the premises were closed and sealed. The CGMC has canceled the casino's operating license, originally granted in November 2025. The operator, Gang Dao International Entertainment, has also been charged with violating Cambodia's Law on the Management of Commercial Gambling. Better known as ‘Scambodia’ Cambodia has a reputation as the primary hub for scams in Southeast Asia. Competing for this dishonorable status with Myanmar and Laos, the country has been given the nickname “Scambodia”. This recent enforcement action aligns with the government's stated renewed effort to eradicate online fraud from the nation. Criminal activities in Cambodia were estimated to have produced $12.5 billion in 2024. The country's casino sector initially emerged in border areas such as Sihanoukville, Poipet, and Bavet. These establishments attracted patrons from nearby nations like Thailand and China, where gambling is prohibited. Under the direction of Chinese criminal syndicates, the industry first branched into online gambling before progressing to online fraud. This illicit trade is notorious for luring individuals with promises of office or IT jobs. Once trapped on site, these victims are coerced into carrying out romance and cryptocurrency scams, frequently under the threat of physical harm. A BBC report from April 6th detailed that at one now-shuttered casino, employees who did not meet their financial targets were subjected to beatings, receiving "a minimum of 10 strokes" from a cane. In a disturbing incident documented by the Washington, DC-based Center for Defense Strategies (C4ADS), a Vietnamese worker named Nyuyen Van Luu tried to sell a kidney to support his family. However, when he arrived for the procedure, he was instead transported to a casino in Poipet, Cambodia. There, he was told, “This is a scam centre. The only options are to work here, be sold elsewhere or call home to ransom you.” “Another friend did the same thing and was … tortured and sold elsewhere,” Nyugen stated after his release. “It seems they made quite a bit of money from this.” More prison time, steeper fines On April 3rd, the Cambodian government endorsed stringent new punishments for individuals convicted of operating scam compounds. By royal decree, operators now risk prison sentences of five to ten years and fines reaching $250,000. Those involved in kidnapping, illegal detention, forced labor, and abuse could be jailed for up to 20 years and fined as much as $500,000. Perpetrators whose actions lead to one or more fatalities can receive a life sentence. While Cambodia is publicly asserting a strong stance and ensuring its proactive measures receive media attention, Amnesty International Co-Regional Director Montse Ferrer remains skeptical. “At a time when the government says it is dismantling the scamming industry, the evidence shows it is simultaneously recognising the plans for casino properties where abusive scamming compounds are run,” he says. Jacob Sims, a visiting fellow at Harvard University’s Asia Center, concurs. “The Cambodian government’s PR campaign has definitely stepped it up a notch,” he told Time Magazine. “It’s … speaking the language of a sanitised international organisation. But their actual behaviour does not really look like a country that is trying in good faith to eliminate this.” Marjorie PrestonMarjorie began her gaming career in 2007 and has focused on Asian gaming markets since 2020. Outside of work, she writes about travel and film and plays the drums. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - In recent years, US state and tribal gaming regulators have achieved something noteworthy. Within a short span, they have established legal sports betting and iGaming markets that lead globally. They have safeguarded consumers, produced significant public revenue, and substituted substantial parts of the illicit market with regulated, transparent, and accountable options. However, amidst this success, new challenges are surfacing. Throughout the policy environment, the efficacy of state regulation is undergoing active scrutiny. Federal initiatives such as the SAFE Bet Act indicate an increasing belief that state-level frameworks might not be adequate to manage the inherent risks of digital gaming. Concurrently, emerging online operators, including social and sweepstakes gaming and prediction markets, are asserting that they operate entirely beyond conventional state regulatory jurisdiction. This includes contentions that fundamental compliance mechanisms, like geolocation, are either unneeded or impractical. Collectively, these occurrences signify more than mere policy discussions. They pose a direct threat to the long-standing state-centric model that has overseen gaming in the United States for many years. From my perspective as a former regulator, I contend that the most impactful response is not theoretical, but rather practical and verifiable. States have demonstrated their capacity to launch new markets; now, regulators must persist in proving their ability to maintain these markets with equivalent diligence amidst swiftly changing risks. The subsequent stage of regulation: ongoing watchfulness Regulation is not a fixed practice. It is a dynamic system that needs to adapt in parallel with technological advancements, shifts in consumer conduct, and the actions of malicious entities and offenders. The dangers confronting regulated gaming markets today are profoundly distinct from those of even a few years past. Progress in artificial intelligence is enhancing fraudulent activities. Cunning operators are probing the weaknesses and susceptibilities of technological and compliance frameworks. Furthermore, the distinctions between legal and unregulated markets are becoming progressively indistinct. In this context, merely upholding high standards is insufficient. State and tribal regulators are also obligated to consistently verify if these standards are being practically observed. Independent assessments, continuous audits, and practical validation of compliance systems should not be perceived as encumbrances; rather, they are vital instruments for guaranteeing that regulatory structures operate as designed. This holds especially true for critical areas underpinning contemporary digital gaming supervision: identity confirmation, fraud deterrence, cybersecurity measures, responsible gaming protections, anti-money laundering (AML) and suspicious transaction surveillance, game fairness safeguards, and location adherence. These are not superficial requirements. They constitute the bedrock of consumer safety and gaming honesty. Moreover, they are the precise controls that differentiate regulated markets from their unregulated counterparts, thereby solidifying the states' role as the principal overseers of gaming. This is precisely why assertions that such protections are discretionary ought to be thoroughly examined. The hazard of progressive deterioration A less apparent danger within any established regulatory market is not sudden collapse, but rather a slow decline. As markets expand and competition intensifies among operators and technology compliance providers, a subtle impetus may arise to relax interpretations of current standards. Gradually, previously unambiguous expectations can be inconsistently implemented or upheld. This observation is not a criticism directed at any specific operator, testing facility, vendor, or regulator. It represents an inherent characteristic of expanding markets. However, this is precisely why attentiveness is crucial. Even minor deficiencies – be it in geolocation, KYC/AML, transaction oversight, or fraud deterrence – possess the potential for widespread exploitation in digital settings. For consumers, this could translate to heightened vulnerability to deception or detriment. For state and tribal regulators, it might lead to reduced assurance in the efficacy of their supervision. And for the entire industry, it could jeopardize the painstakingly established credibility. Upholding rigorous standards demands more than merely establishing them. It necessitates their continuous revision, evaluation, and enforcement. Achieving equilibrium between robustness and longevity None of these points imply that increased regulation is invariably superior. Excessively onerous requirements have the potential to push consumers back towards unregulated markets. This is a risk that regulators are keenly aware of. The objective is equilibrium: robust, enforceable safeguards that foster a secure and competitive legal market while implementing effective risk mitigation protocols. However, such equilibrium relies on transparency. State and tribal regulators need to ascertain what is effective, what is not, and where deficiencies and susceptibilities might be appearing. This understanding is only attainable through proactive supervision and enforcement. The way ahead The bedrock of legal gaming in the United States has consistently been trust. Trust from consumers, from legislative bodies, and from the general populace. This trust is not self-perpetuating. It requires reinforcement through concrete actions. For state and tribal regulators, this entails leveraging the very instruments that guarantee accountability: Consistent and impartial assessment of compliance frameworks. Unambiguous and uniform application of current regulations. Continuous appraisal of nascent risks, evaluation methodologies, encompassing AI-powered fraud, recognized and developing threats, and shifting consumer patterns. Transparent communication with industry participants, technology vendors, and advocacy organizations. For those within the industry, it signifies embracing these initiatives as fundamental to the enduring feasibility of the market and their own sustained operation. The preceding years have showcased the capabilities of state regulators in construction. The forthcoming years will ascertain their capacity for maintenance. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - As the Premier League prepares to implement its prohibition on gambling firms as primary shirt sponsors next season, several clubs are facing a difficult search for replacement partners. Currently, nine clubs have yet to finalize agreements for their primary jersey real estate, while 12 others are still waiting on signed contracts. One club official estimated that the total revenue shortfall from these sponsorship changes could reach £80 million in the upcoming season. Although the league introduced a voluntary ban three years ago and pushed the deadline to the 2026-27 season to allow for a transition, many teams are still at risk of beginning the next campaign without a sponsor. Non-“Big Six” Clubs Face Reduced Sponsorship Values The league's elite "Big Six"—comprising Arsenal (partnered with Emirates), Liverpool (Standard Chartered), Manchester City (Etihad Airways), Manchester United (Snapdragon), Tottenham (AIA), and Chelsea—typically command between £40 million and £60 million annually for their shirt rights. Chelsea is a notable exception; their partnership with IFS is set to expire at the end of this term, and the club has entered the last three seasons without a confirmed front-of-shirt sponsor. The financial pressure is most evident among clubs outside this top tier. Bournemouth recently signed a "cut-price" £4 million annual deal with stadium sponsor Vitality, a move seen as a reflection of the current market's volatility. While Everton and Fulham are reportedly in advanced talks with CMC Markets for deals slightly higher than their current agreements with Stake and SBOBet, seven other clubs currently partnered with gambling firms have yet to find new sponsors. “Nearly everyone is seeing a decline in revenue,” a high-ranking executive noted. “Outside the big six, sponsorship offers have fallen by approximately 50% from previous levels of £8 million to £12 million. It is an incredibly challenging market. “Furthermore, the trend of moving sleeve or training kit sponsors to the front of the shirt is creating a negative ripple effect on those secondary sponsorship categories.” Notably, Everton (Stake) and West Ham (Boyle Sports) plan to relocate their gambling sponsors to their sleeves next season, as the ban only applies to the front of the jersey. Everton may face further complications following the UK government's plan to prohibit unlicensed gambling firms from sponsoring teams, which could impact their relationship with Stake, a platform currently blocked in the UK. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - South Korean authorities have detained five senior citizens, some in their seventies, during a raid on an alleged illegal gambling operation. According to a report by JTBC, police from the Incheon Yeonsu District Police Station discovered people wagering on go-stop card games in the basement of an apartment building. The identities of those arrested were not disclosed, though police confirmed one suspect was a woman in her sixties. A spokesperson stated others were in their seventies. The raid was conducted at 3 p.m. KST on April 5 following a tip from a local resident, investigators stated. Authorities reported that while several individuals tried to escape, all were successfully detained. At the location, officers confiscated a deck of hwatu cards, used to play go-stop, along with an unspecified sum of money. A game of go-stop. (Image: @BoardLive/YouTube/Screenshot) South Korean Septuagenarians Face Gambling Wrap Police stated the property is owned by the female suspect, who allegedly used it to "host gambling sessions." Detectives said participants paid her a fee for each arranged session. The remaining four individuals were held for interrogation on suspicion of gambling offenses. The betting rules involved losers paying winners 3,000 won ($2) per game, plus a 1,000 won ($0.67) bonus per point, according to police. The group had gathered to play around 50 times before the police action. All suspects have been formally charged, though the inquiry remains open. Police noted some detainees have previous gambling records and described the amounts wagered as "substantial." Controversial Crackdowns Crackdowns on go-stop gambling by police and prosecutors have drawn varied responses. Last year, South Korean commentators criticized prosecutors for pursuing a Supreme Court case against a 69-year-old man accused of gambling on go-stop with friends. The man won a pot of $79 and had planned to spend most of it on fried chicken and beer for the group. Commentators labeled the sum "pocket change." An elderly resident of Northern Seoul told CasinoBeats the case appeared "quite frivolous for judges and public prosecutors to spend time and money on." Conversely, some argue gambling-related crime is a growing issue among older populations. A media report this year observed retirees gathering in Seoul parks to bet on board games such as go and janggi, a game similar to Chinese chess. Reports from other regions have also documented elderly groups gambling in structurally unsound buildings. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - For viewers hoping to catch up on current events without a prediction market ticker scrolling at the bottom of the screen, the most prominent news networks will no longer be an option. This is due to Kalshi now securing agreements with all three major cable news networks: CNN, CNBC, and now FOX News. On April 7, Kalshi revealed it is adding another media partner to its roster, a partnership that will deliver the firm's forecasting data to FOX News Media properties and the FOX One streaming service. News for the people by the people. https://t.co/tjJHVD5jfU— Tarek Mansour (@mansourtarek_) April 7, 2026 The arrangement will integrate Kalshi's data into programming on FOX News Channel, FOX Business Network, FOX Weather, and FOX One. The companies stated the live market data will be incorporated into FOX's reporting on politics, the economy, weather, and culture, with Kalshi collaborating directly with FOX's data and production teams on graphics and broadcast integrations. By securing deals with three of the largest cable news and business networks, Kalshi has guaranteed its prediction market odds will become a regular feature in mainstream reporting on politics, economics, and culture for millions of audiences. Kalshi's swift move into mainstream media indicates it is positioning itself as more than just a platform for trading event contracts. The firm is now marketing itself as a media entity, and news outlets are accepting that proposition, increasingly willing to use its data as a real-time gauge of public sentiment. FOX Adds Another Outlet for Kalshi’s Market Data The new partnership incorporates Kalshi's data into FOX's broadcast and online news coverage, with both firms presenting prediction markets as an additional layer of context for audiences tracking major stories. Rather than solely reporting on past events, FOX will now utilize Kalshi data to augment conventional polling and expert analysis. The network asserts this will offer viewers a "nonpartisan" metric on the likelihood of a future event occurring. Kalshi cites specific statistics to justify its expansion into news media: approximately 70% of visitors to its website check market odds, while only 30% place trades. Tarek Mansour, co-founder and CEO of Kalshi, addressed this point directly in the announcement: More people are monitoring Kalshi’s forecasts than trading on them, which is significant: our data serves as an effective complement to news and polls. As misinformation becomes more prevalent, Kalshi provides accurate, impartial data to help people gain a clearer understanding of world events. Kalshi maintains that its markets "harness the power of the wisdom of the crowds," contending that by delivering its odds to FOX News, "the most watched television news channel for 24 consecutive years," audiences will gain from its methodology being accessible on one of American media's most powerful platforms. The Financialization of News Continues The FOX agreement marks another advance in Kalshi's aggressive media expansion, a strategy the prediction market platform has followed in recent months by signing "exclusive" or "official" deals with several news industry leaders. Kalshi's foray into mainstream news started in December 2025, when it became the official prediction market partner for CNN. Just days later, Kalshi inked an exclusive multi-year deal with CNBC, introducing its data to the financial news network. These partnerships align with the Kalshi CEO's long-term goal to "financialize everything" and transform any divergence of opinion into a tradable asset. Although social media critics have labeled his vision "casino capitalism," the media sector is adopting prediction markets to increase viewer engagement. Commenting on the FOX News partnership with Kalshi, Paul Cheesbrough, CEO of Tubi Media Group, stated: Integrating Kalshi’s real-time data into our rapidly expanding streaming platform FOX One and across FOX News Media’s top networks provides our audiences with richer insights and a more interactive method for following the most important stories. Following a $1 billion funding round led by Coatue Management in March 2026, which pushed Kalshi's valuation to $22 billion as reported by the Wall Street Journal, the company undoubtedly has the resources to sustain its leading market position. For the typical viewer, this transforms news consumption from a passive activity. Similar to how watching sports can resemble being in a betting shop, watching the news will more and more resemble monitoring a live scoreboard, with each headline representing a fluctuating probability. Whether Kalshi is correct that its odds provide essential context, or instead transforms the news cycle into a round-the-clock betting arena, is expected to be a topic of discussion among media analysts for the foreseeable future. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Maine follows Indiana as the second state this year to prohibit online sweepstakes casinos, a move finalized when Gov. Janet Mills signed LD 2007 into law on April 6. Following the governor's approval, the legislation has been enacted as Chapter 645 of Maine public law. It bans the promotion and operation of online sweepstakes games that employ a dual-currency system to mimic casino-style offerings, including slots, poker, bingo, lottery games, and sports betting. Regulators in Maine now possess enhanced enforcement mechanisms to target these digital platforms, reflecting growing national momentum against sweepstakes casinos. The legislation, titled “An Act Regarding the Prohibition of Online Sweepstakes Games,” focuses on the dual-currency framework utilized by many social casinos. These platforms allow users to purchase “gold coins” for entertainment purposes while granting “sweeps coins” that can be exchanged for cash rewards. This activity is now classified as a civil infraction and is also prosecutable as illegal gambling within the state. Pursuant to the statute, violators are subject to civil penalties ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. Additionally, licensed gambling operators found in breach of the law face the potential revocation of their licenses and disqualification from future licensure. The state legislature approved the bill on April 2, and the governor enacted it several days afterward. The Scope of Maine’s New Legislation Under the new law, an “online sweepstakes game” is defined as any internet-based contest, game, or promotion accessible via computer, phone, or similar device that utilizes a “dual-currency system of payment” and simulates casino-style gaming. The statute explains that the dual-currency system employed by sweepstakes casinos is structured to prevent the direct purchase of redeemable tokens. Instead, it incentivizes the purchase of separate products or currency that provide a chance to win cash or cash equivalents. The law stipulates that “a person that operates or promotes an online sweepstakes game or supports the operation or promotion of an online sweepstakes game commits a civil violation.” It further clarifies that such behavior amounts to unlawful gambling. Fines collected under this legislation will be directed specifically to the state’s Gambling Addiction Prevention and Treatment Fund. Indiana Enacted a Comparable Ban, Yet the Regulation Debate Persists Maine’s legislation makes it the second state this year to implement a sweepstakes prohibition, following Indiana’s enactment of its own ban via HB 1052, which was signed by Gov. Mike Braun on March 12. Indiana’s legislation similarly targeted dual-currency sweepstakes platforms that mimic casino-style games and established penalties of up to $100,000. Although the language and structure of the two laws indicate a shared approach to suppressing sweepstakes casinos, Maine’s legislation is more specific in connecting violations to unlawful gambling and the revocation of licenses. Nevertheless, some argue that prohibiting sweepstakes casinos may not be the most effective strategy for state oversight and consumer protection.Speaking with CasinoBeats in February, ARB Interactive CEO Patrick Fechtmeyer contended that states should instead regulate and tax the industry, cautioning that bans could simply drive players toward offshore platforms that are out of reach of state regulators. He remarked: “It’s not really a question of, ‘We ban this industry, and it’s going to go away.’ It’s, ‘Where does that money shift to? How do you capture that?’” Fechtmeyer further warned of the risk of players moving to offshore sites, stating: “The main risk is that offshore operators won’t stop. You’ll have no ability to capture any tax revenue. More importantly, you’ll have no consumer protection.” With both Indiana and Maine having enacted these laws in 2026, this debate is expected to persist as additional states determine whether to outlaw sweepstakes casinos entirely or establish a regulatory framework for them. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - France’s gambling sector has shown tangible progress in curbing excessive gambling and underage participation, yet additional efforts are required to meet the ambitious targets aimed at reducing problem gambling rates by 2027. This finding comes from a report published by France’s national gambling regulator, l’Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ). In 2024, the French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction estimated that roughly 1.17 million people across France exhibit problematic gambling behaviors, with approximately 360,000 categorized as excessive gamblers. Concerns over gambling are particularly pronounced among minors. The ARPEJ’s ENJEU-Mineurs survey, supported by the ANJ, found that in 2025, 42.6% of 15- to 17-year-olds (among 5,000 survey respondents) had gambled at least once in the previous year — a nearly 8% increase since 2021 — despite a strict legal ban on selling gambling products to minors. The ANJ also noted that a significant share of gross gaming revenue comes from problem gamblers. Pre-pandemic data showed that around 38% of GGR was generated by problem gamblers, with 20.7% attributable to excessive players. The regulator recently warned that prediction market platforms operate around the clock and often lack protective safeguards such as spending limits or identity verification. In 2024, the ANJ investigated Polymarket and concluded that its services qualify as unauthorised gambling operations. The regulator cautioned that prediction market platforms “are not authorised in France and are considered illegal gambling services.” Online play, casinos and racecourses Most licensed operators have implemented measures to deter underage participation, according to the review. These include stricter age verification during registration, targeted public information campaigns for adults, and guidance on parental control tools. Detection of excessive gambling behavior online has improved notably, with operators identifying 89,000 excessive players in 2025, up from 31,000 in 2024. Nonetheless, the regulator has ordered online operators to scale up their identification efforts in proportion to their user bases and deliver measurable results. Casinos and gaming clubs have enhanced their identification and support mechanisms. Over 2,200 staff members have completed an ANJ e-learning prevention module launched in November 2024, representing a substantial portion of the sector’s workforce. Despite this progress, one casino’s prevention plan was rejected outright, signaling ongoing deficiencies in some operations. Racecourse operators, coordinated by the National Federation of Horse Racing, have expanded the provision of player information, volunteer training, and oversight measures. Nevertheless, the ANJ has pushed for more robust minor protection by separating family areas from betting zones and ensuring children’s entertainment does not indirectly encourage young people to start gambling. These developments come as France establishes new regulatory frameworks and calls for stricter enforcement. Earlier this year, the ANJ formally launched a new regulatory regime, Jeux à Objets Numériques Monétisables (JONUM), for games featuring monetizable digital objects. This framework allows players to acquire monetizable digital items such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs) or blockchain-based products, and it will operate as a three-year experimental program. The regulator has also called for a total ban on gambling advertising, and plans to use the 2026 FIFA World Cup to run a large-scale campaign promoting responsible gambling. Kathryn EvansKathryn reports on concise breaking news, with a primary focus on EMEA and U.S. gambling legislation. A proud native of North Wales, fluent Welsh speaker, and lifelong supporter of Wrexham FC — long before the club gained global Hollywood attention. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - A recent YouGov survey commissioned by the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) indicates that 65% of UK gamblers would decline to submit personal financial records, such as payslips or bank statements, if such documentation were mandated to maintain their betting accounts. These findings have amplified industry anxieties that the proposed affordability assessments might compel users to abandon regulated platforms in favor of the illicit gambling sector. Significant hesitation to disclose information The YouGov report, released by the BGC on Wednesday, highlights a marked reluctance among bettors to divulge private financial data as part of enhanced verification procedures. This resistance poses a risk of substantial customer loss for the regulated industry should the Gambling Commission implement compulsory, document-based financial risk evaluations. These results align with earlier data gathered by the BGC via a Freedom of Information request regarding a Gambling Commission study. That previous research revealed that 77% of more than 12,000 participants were against financial risk checks, with only 14% of regular bettors expressing a willingness to share financial details. The BGC suggests these combined figures indicate that mandatory financial documentation requirements may impact customers more severely than regulators anticipate. During initial testing of financial vulnerability check protocols, the BGC identified several issues, including ambiguous or inconsistent data, unclear outcomes for users, and increased friction throughout the customer experience. Sharing banking data is not ‘frictionless’ “Ministers gave assurances of frictionless checks, yet the Gambling Commission appears to be moving toward the exact opposite,” stated Grainne Hurst, CEO of the Betting and Gaming Council. “Compelling punters to surrender bank statements is far from ‘frictionless’; it is invasive and will drive users toward the illegal market, where no protections exist. “This poll conveys a clear message from bettors. A majority (65%) are unwilling to provide this sensitive financial data. In practice, that figure could prove even higher once these checks are implemented. “These measures will push customers away from the regulated sector and into the harmful, unregulated black market, thereby undermining the very safeguards these checks are intended to provide. “The vast majority of customers gamble safely and within their means. Our focus should be on protecting the vulnerable, rather than imposing unnecessary barriers on millions of typical punters. “Failing to strike the right balance will not only erode customer trust but will also increase risks to individuals and further stimulate the growth of the illegal market.” In 2024, a petition opposing these checks garnered over 100,000 signatures, prompting a Westminster Hall debate where then-minister Stuart Andrew MP stated that such checks would only be implemented if they were “truly frictionless.” Industry-wide concerns These apprehensions are shared across the racing industry. In an open letter to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, the British Horseracing Authority warned that excessively rigid financial risk assessments could lead to unintended negative consequences for the sport. The letter cautioned that intrusive affordability requirements risk alienating regular bettors, which would ultimately affect the funding model for racing. “This unprecedented state interference in the private lives of citizens has dismayed the millions who enjoy horse racing.” The BGC has increasingly highlighted the dangers of unregulated gaming, estimating that as much as £60 million was wagered with unlicensed operators during the Cheltenham Festival. Kathryn EvansKathryn covers bitesize breaking news with a primary focus on EMEA and US legislation. A proud North Walian, fluent Welsh speaker and lifelong Wrexham FC fan – long before Hollywood came calling. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Stefan Tweraser took on the role of CEO at German lottery brokerage Zeal in September, bringing a wealth of experience from diverse fields including e-commerce, consulting, and rocket engineering. In a recent conversation with iGB, the CEO shared how his varied background has equipped him for the gambling sector, including a profound understanding of how regulation can benefit an industry. “Before joining Zeal, I was at Rocket Factory Augsburg, where we developed launch vehicles for satellites – a highly regulated environment,” he stated. “My key takeaway from that experience is that well-implemented regulation provides a clear framework for innovation, defining the boundaries for new developments and non-negotiable aspects like safety. At Zeal, these principles are directly applicable to areas such as responsible gambling.” Tweraser mentioned that the board was specifically looking for a candidate with experience in regulated industries. He also brought a deep understanding of highly scalable digital platforms. Discussions with the board included strategies for utilizing regulation to foster innovation. “I am a firm believer that regulation, when applied correctly, is a catalyst for the right kind of innovation,” Tweraser told iGB. “Without it, innovation can easily become driven by short-term tactics or questionable practices. Robust and consistently enforced regulation establishes a level playing field, enabling companies to concentrate on what truly matters: delivering value to customers.” Experience in ecommerce Prior to his work at Rocket Factory, Tweraser held executive positions at the independent music platform Deezer. He also gained experience at Google and A1 Telekom Austria. His background with other e-commerce platforms has also informed Zeal’s broader strategy, as the company aims to be more than just a gambling product provider. “That experience is directly relevant to Zeal, where demand can surge dramatically in very short periods, especially during major jackpots. Managing these fluctuations, both technologically and in terms of customer experience, requires a different approach compared to more predictable e-commerce models.” Before delving into the industry and Zeal itself, Tweraser admitted he had “underestimated the attractiveness of the sector.” “Initially, I was drawn to the ability to operate across the entire value chain. However, as I gained a deeper understanding, I became increasingly impressed by the underlying customer motivations,” he added. “What is particularly compelling is how our product teams translate these motivations into unique offerings.” Zeal beats revenue forecast in FY25 despite weak jackpot period In March, Zeal announced a 16% revenue increase across its entire business, reaching €218 million in FY25. The operator noted that this revenue growth in lotteries occurred despite a “weak jackpot environment” in 2025. Revenue for the period exceeded the forecasted range of €205 million to €215 million by 2%, reaching €218 million. EBITDA reached €68.8 million, hitting the upper end of the previously projected €63 million to €68 million range. The company is optimistic about the upcoming year and anticipates continuing to increase its marketing investment at a pace faster than its revenue growth. Furthermore, Tweraser indicated that Zeal is exploring additional investments in the prize draw sector, potentially expanding its operations beyond Germany. The CEO remains highly confident in the growth potential of the lottery sector. “While the category might appear somewhat traditional at first glance, in reality, very few products offer people the chance to dream big – even if only for a few moments,” he told iGB. “I firmly believe the category can be highly engaging when positioned and communicated effectively.” Tweraser succeeded Helmut Becker, the long-serving CEO who departed the sector after a decade at Zeal Network. Last June, Becker informed iGB of his intention to shift his focus to investing in new startups and entrepreneurship, seeking investments across a broader range of sectors than just gaming. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Macau's casino industry reported gross gaming revenue of MOP22.62 billion ($2.8 billion) for March, a 15% increase compared to March 2025, as per data from the Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ). The figure represents a 9.8% rise from February, driven by strong tourist numbers and gaming activity over the Lunar New Year holiday period. For the first quarter, spanning January to March, the sector's GGR reached MOP65.87 billion, marking a 14.3% year-on-year gain against Q1 2025. While this quarterly result remains 13.5% below the 2019 level, CBRE Equity Research suggests that if current positive momentum holds, the full-year 2026 GGR could expand by 8.3% year-on-year. This projection surpasses the firm's earlier forecast of 6% growth. Economic stimulus boosts consumer confidence In a Monday research note, CBRE analysts John DeCree and Max Marsh linked the positive performance to vigorous tourism and Macau's ongoing efforts to develop its base mass market. They also cited a more stable economic environment in China. Beijing established an annual GDP growth target of 4.5% to 5% in March. Public policy analyst Zhu Fangfei described this as a stable shift "from high-speed growth to … high-quality development." According to DeCree and Marsh, "the Chinese consumer continues to benefit from targeted stimulus." They further noted that for the majority of operators, "the magnitude of topline growth in first quarter 2026 was enough to support continued EBITDA growth … even [for] those that might have given up some GGR share in exchange for profitability." They also observed that operating expenses and "competitive pressures" among the six major casino concessionaires are "stabilising." "We expect promotional activity to remain elevated but stabilise in full-year 2026," the analysts wrote. They added that an increase in operational expenditures "should also normalise as many concession-related opex investments are now baked into the cost structure." Macau banks on mass play, entertainment Continued investments in entertainment offerings in Macau "should attract additional visitation, particularly from the base mass segment that has yet to fully recover," the investment firm stated. This observation matches a Macao News report highlighting that March is typically a slower month for tourism outside of holiday periods. Casino operators have counteracted this seasonal lull by hosting major entertainment acts. On March 28, the K-pop group ATEEZ performed to a full house at the 14,000-seat Venetian Arena. That same evening, Taiwanese-American rapper Mark Tuan drew over 5,000 attendees to the Studio City Event Center. superstar entertainment brings the crowds to macau casinos. a 28 march concert by korean boy band ateez sold out the 14,000-seat venetian arena. Operators diversify their entertainment lineup to appeal to a broader audience beyond just younger patrons. For instance, Citi analysts noted that in one month last summer, concerts by Korean Cantopop star Jacky Cheung were associated with a 16% rise in premium play and a 36% increase in the average wager at Galaxy Macau. 2026 outlook still short of pre-Covid benchmark CBRE's forecast of 8.6% GGR growth is more than twice as high as the more cautious estimate from Macau's government. Local authorities have set an annual GGR target of MOP236 billion, which is 3.5% above a revised 2025 goal of MOP228 billion. Separately, S&P Global anticipates "slow but steady" growth between 3% and 7% as Macau transitions "from a post-pandemic rebound to a more maturity-driven phase." Jefferies projects annual growth of 5.3%. Nonetheless, none of these forecasts predict that GGR will top the MOP292.45 billion recorded in 2019. Marjorie PrestonMarjorie began her gaming career in 2007 and has focused on Asian gaming markets since 2020. Outside of work, she writes about travel and film and plays the drums. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - The 2026 Masters tournament gets underway on Thursday at Augusta National, and you can heighten your viewing experience by wagering on five entertaining prop bets. Sportsbooks feature a selection of bets that are usually not available for typical PGA Tour tournaments. We are utilizing odds from DraftKings Sportsbook, but be sure to check the market to guarantee the best value for your wagers. Masters Prop Odds at DraftKings Will There Be a Hole-in-One? (Yes -162, No +125) Since 1934, there have been 34 holes-in-one recorded in Masters history. Augusta National is home to four par-3 holes, with No. 16 being the most fruitful, having witnessed 24 aces. Stewart Cink is the last player to record a hole-in-one at The Masters. He aced No. 16 in the second round on Friday in 2022. Ace! Stewart Cink makes a hole-in-one on No. 16. #themasters pic.twitter.com/Wss03ghX21— The Masters (@TheMasters) April 8, 2022 In 2021, holes-in-one were carded by both Tommy Fleetwood (16th hole) and Corey Connors (6th hole). After a three-year span without an ace, will 2026 be the year we see one? Pick: No (+125) Will There Be an Albatross? (Yes, +1600) For those new to golf, an albatross is when a player scores three-under-par on a single hole. It is rarer than a hole-in-one, with only four albatrosses ever occurring at The Masters. Gene Sarazen notched the first albatross in 1935, hitting a “double eagle” on No. 15. The full list appears below: Gene Sarazen (1935, No. 15) Bruce Delvin (1967, No. 8), Jeff Maggert (1994, No. 13) Louis Oosthuizen (2012, No. 2) DraftKings does not list a “No” option, so… Pick: No bet Will There Be a Playoff With 2+ Players? (Yes, +400) Lastly, here is a bet to get excited about. Augusta National has seen 18 playoffs, including last year's, where the eventual champion Rory McIlroy defeated Justin Rose after one playoff hole. Rose also fell to Sergio Garcia in a sudden-death playoff in 2017. There might be some recency bias involved, but we are favoring a playoff for the second year in a row. Pick: Yes (+400) Top European Finisher Ludvig Aberg of Sweden was one of the three golfers we selected to win the 2026 Masters, so he fits perfectly here. Aberg has only competed at Augusta National twice, yet he seems to have already “mastered” the venue. He took second place in his 2024 debut and notched a T-7 finish last year, a result that could have been improved. Aberg was tied with McIlroy and Rose late on Sunday, but closed with a bogey and a triple-bogey on the final two holes. He is ready for redemption. Pick: Ludvig Aberg (+820) First Round Leader Bryson DeChambeau is edging closer to his first Masters victory. He has started quickly over the past two years, leading the 2024 Masters at -7 after the first round. Last year, he began strongly again at -3, just four shots off the pace set by the leader (Rose) on Thursday. With results of T-5 and T-6 in the last two years, DeChambeau needs a strong finish to secure that initial win. However, his recent trend of fast starts makes this a compelling wager at attractive odds. Pick: Bryson DeChambeau (+1700) This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Washington has petitioned a federal judge to remand its civil enforcement lawsuit against Kalshi back to state court, escalating the state’s ongoing legal conflict with the prediction market platform. This filing arrived on the same day the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals secured a major victory for Kalshi in its dispute with New Jersey. On April 6, the state submitted a remand motion, arguing that its lawsuit relies exclusively on Washington state law and that Kalshi’s claim of federal preemption does not provide a valid basis for moving the case to federal court. The state has criticized what it views as a legal tactic Kalshi uses to stall proceedings, stating in the motion: Kalshi is aware its effort to remove the case will likely fail. Still, the company moved forward with the removal because delaying the case is financially beneficial. Washington’s most recent legal submission adds another layer to the increasingly chaotic legal battle over event contracts. A divided Third Circuit panel ruled 2-to-1 in Kalshi’s favor during its case against New Jersey, determining that the company’s sports-focused event contracts fall within the purview of the Commodity Exchange Act and the exclusive regulatory authority of the CFTC. This ruling bolsters Kalshi’s position that disagreements over event contracts should be heard in federal court, even as Washington works to have its own lawsuit against the prediction market platform returned to state court, framing the conflict as a straightforward gambling enforcement matter. Washington further contends that Kalshi has employed comparable legal strategies in other cases where the company attempted to move gambling law-related disputes to federal court. Kalshi’s CEO said their long-term vision is to “financialize everything and create a tradeable asset out of any difference in opinion.” That is not the principle grounded in our constitution nor the future we want for ourselves and our children. We’re suing Kalshi for illegal… pic.twitter.com/VnqgjknWUn— Attorney General Nick Brown (@AGOWA) April 1, 2026 In its filing, the state points out that federal courts in Nevada and Massachusetts have already dismissed similar removal arguments, and courts in Kentucky and Ohio have also remanded private-party lawsuits. Washington Argues Removal Attempt Is a Delay Tactic Washington maintains that Kalshi’s push to move the case to federal court is part of a standard legal playbook the event contract exchange has utilized across multiple similar disputes nationwide. In the motion, the state explains that Kalshi has implemented a “two-part strategy” consisting of “preemptively filing declaratory judgment lawsuits in federal courts” and “removing state court cases using increasingly convoluted and weakened removal arguments that have already been widely rejected.” The state maintains that its lawsuit should stay in state court, as it is rooted solely in Washington state law and does not assert any federal legal claims. The state further argues that Kalshi is inappropriately relying on federal preemption as a basis for federal jurisdiction, despite the fact that preemption is typically considered a defense, not a valid reason to remove a case to federal court. As the state put it in the motion: The State’s lawsuit, filed in state court, alleges violations of Washington state law. It does not assert any federal legal claims, reference federal statutes, or raise any federal legal questions. The motion frames Kalshi’s preemption arguments as a “basic federal preemption defense, not a claim of complete preemption,” which Washington asserts does not satisfy the legal requirements for removing a case to federal court. The filing is even more direct when responding to Kalshi’s claim that federal definitions should govern terms such as “bets” and “wagers,” stating: This is absurd. If the lack of a statutory definition in a state law was enough to create a federal legal issue that grants federal subject-matter jurisdiction, no cases would ever be heard in state court again. The state is requesting attorney’s fees and court costs, arguing that there was “no objectively reasonable justification” for removing the case, given the numerous remand rulings cited in its legal filing. Third Circuit Ruling Adds Pressure to Already-Complex Legal Battle The timing of Washington’s motion is notable, as it was submitted on the exact same day Kalshi achieved its appellate win in New Jersey.In that case, the Third Circuit ruled that Kalshi’s event contracts qualify as “swaps” under federal law, supporting the company’s position that states cannot regulate these contracts as standard gambling products. In response to the ruling, Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Michael Selig posted on X that the decision “reaffirms Congress’ intention for the @CFTC to hold exclusive regulatory authority over trades conducted on DCMs.” The Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision today reaffirms Congress' intent for the @CFTC to have exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over trades on DCMs. I applaud the Court’s decision to uphold federal law and reject the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement’s attempt to…— Mike Selig (@ChairmanSelig) April 6, 2026 Although the Third Circuit’s ruling does not directly resolve Washington’s remand request, it may still shape how courts approach the jurisdictional conflict. It also deepens the split over whether prediction markets should be regulated under state gambling laws or federal commodities oversight rules. For now, Washington is working to ensure the next stage of the legal fight takes place in state court. The outcome of this effort could influence the possible remedies in the lawsuit, as well as how aggressively other states target Kalshi using their own state gambling laws. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Indonesian authorities have seized assets valued at more than $3 million following a raid targeting an alleged online gambling operation. The South Jakarta District Attorney’s Office verified it had secured IDR 55 billion ($3.25 million) in "evidence" after the police operation, according to a report by the Indonesian media outlet Tempo. Prosecutors stated the raid was conducted by the National Police's Criminal Investigation Agency, referred to as Bareskrim Polri. A public prosecutor, Murari Azis, announced the office is prepared to bring gambling-related charges against five suspects. $3 Million Raid: Investigations Expand All gambling activities are prohibited in Indonesia. Recently, police, prosecutors, and government bodies have initiated a significant nationwide clampdown on online gambling. Officials state urgent action is required as addiction rates keep climbing. The enforcement campaign is escalating across the country, with Bareskrim Polri units making arrests and confiscating assets. Investigators are widening their probes, which they say has led to the discovery of connected money laundering operations. In Tangerang, Java, police report confiscating cash, properties, high-end motorcycles, gold, and a "collection of luxury handbags" from an individual suspected of being a money laundering ringleader. Bareskrim Polri officials in Java said the probe started with a raid conducted on December 4, 2025. That operation led police to effectively close the online gambling platforms CIVICTOTO and JALUTOTO, as reported by the Indonesian media outlet Sin Po. Police stated these two sites yielded monthly net profits of up to $17,700 for their operators. As inquiries progressed, police claimed to have uncovered evidence that the alleged ringleader operated a network of at least 17 accomplices who assisted in laundering money from the platforms. “The suspect ran this illicit enterprise as if it were a professional company,” a senior Bareskrim Polri officer informed reporters. Online gambling addiction is escalating rapidly in Indonesia, leading government officials to label betting platforms a “social disaster.” Addiction Cases Increase Health authorities report a sharp rise in hospital admissions for severe gambling addiction. Officials at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in central Jakarta say they are treating a swiftly increasing number of inpatients and outpatients addicted to gambling. Government officials have previously estimated that as many as 9 million people in Indonesia suffer from online gambling addictions. Muhaimin Iskandar, the Coordinating Minister for Community Empowerment, visited the hospital earlier. During his visit, he remarked, “Online gambling is a social disaster. It’s a disease that erodes social well-being.” Indonesian District Prosecutor’s Office vehicles. (Image: DARMAS BS 9 [CC BY-SA 4.0]) Police Warn of Rising Crime Police have cautioned that this surge in addiction is triggering an increase in crime. According to the Indonesian media outlet VOI, North Jakarta police arrested a 24-year-old employee of a drinking water depot suspected of stealing money from his employer to fund online gambling. The employee is accused of stealing a motorcycle, a mobile phone, and a drawer containing cash from the premises. If convicted, he could face up to seven years in prison. Police reported the man was found hiding at his grandmother's residence and has confessed fully. In recent weeks, North Sumatra police announced they had dismantled a cross-border gambling syndicate believed to have connections to Cambodia. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - FIFA appointed ADI Predictstreet as its official prediction market partner for the World Cup last week; however, the agreement is facing intense scrutiny because the company is mostly unlicensed and has not yet released a functional product. “This historic agreement highlights FIFA's ongoing dedication to innovation and engaging fans,” stated soccer’s governing body in a press release issued last week. The firm has not yet released a website or application, however. Attempts to access predictstreet.io resulted in an “Unprocessable Entity” notification. Although it recently secured a license to operate in Gibraltar, it does not possess official legal status in any other jurisdiction. While numerous European betting firms establish themselves in Gibraltar for tax advantages, they are required to possess local operating licenses. ADI Predictstreet, conversely, holds no additional licenses, restricting its services to Gibraltar’s population of 36,000. “This collaboration represents a pivotal milestone for ADI Predictstreet and the way audiences interact with major events, as we establish the groundwork for a new sector merging collective intelligence, technology, and real-world results,” stated Ajay Hans Raj Bhatia, Principal Council Member of ADI Predictstreet. This arrangement comes after Polymarket reached a deal with Spain's La Liga to serve as the soccer league’s official prediction market partner. Allegations of Insider Trading Against Bhatia “ADI Predictstreet's operations concerning the FIFA World Cup will adhere to FIFA's regulatory and integrity standards, featuring a robust integrity monitoring system that includes real-time surveillance of suspicious trading and structured reporting mechanisms,” FIFA commented. “These measures are designed to guarantee transparency, fairness, and participant safety.” Bhatia, who leads the company and appeared alongside FIFA President Gianni Infantino in the announcement photo, faces accusations of insider trading. Image from Instagram showing FIFA President Infantino signing the agreement with Adistreet’s Ajay Hans Raj Bhatia. India’s Securities and Exchange Board (SEBI) alleged that Bhatia executed trades totaling over $900,000 involving the Indian firm Adani. According to Josimar, Bhatia reportedly had advance notice of a $2 billion investment in Adani, which allowed him to generate a profit of approximately $60,000. To resolve the issue, Bhatia consented to pay SEBI roughly $170,000 and accepted a six-month prohibition on trading in India. Various other prediction market platforms have encountered multiple accusations regarding the facilitation of insider trading. In the US, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has pledged to suppress this activity. However, since ADI Predictstreet is licensed exclusively in Gibraltar, it is not subject to the regulator’s regulations. World Cup Anticipated to Generate Record Betting Volumes Following its agreement with FIFA, ADI Predictstreet is anticipated to roll out markets prior to the World Cup. It remains unclear where it will target users given its current licensing status. A post on X unveiling the platform stated that it was developed to reach more than 5 billion fans. Introducing @PredictstreetThe Official Prediction Market Partner of the @FIFAWorldCup 2026More than 5 billion fans will watch the World Cup.ADI Predictstreet was built to reach every single one of them.The first consumer-facing ecosystem project on ADI Chain is going… pic.twitter.com/oYJpD2eElv— ADI Chain (@ADIChain_) April 2, 2026 This tournament may rank among the largest betting events in history. Caesars Sportsbook’s head of soccer, Mark Bickerdike, expressed his belief that it will surpass the $35 billion wagered during the 2022 World Cup. “Anticipation for next summer's World Cup is immense. An extended tournament held in a time zone favorable to U.S. customers is likely to make this the highest-handling soccer competition the industry has ever witnessed,” remarked Bickerdike. Both prediction markets and sportsbooks will compete to attract bettors. Meanwhile, FIFA aims to monetize the tournament's popularity by implementing dynamic ticket pricing and establishing an online marketplace for ticket and NFT transactions. The organization, headquartered in Switzerland, has encountered a criminal complaint alleging that certain aspects of its ticketing system constitute illegal gambling. There has been no response to the allegations that ADI Predictstreet is an unfit partner due to its uncertain legal status. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - In a Monday announcement shared on X, Polymarket stated it is rolling out what it describes as the largest infrastructure update since the decentralized prediction market first launched in 2020. The updates include a reconstructed trading engine, revised smart contracts, and a new collateral token named Polymarket USD. We’ve listened to your feedback, and we’re thrilled to announce Polymarket is receiving a full exchange upgrade.Over the coming few weeks, we’re launching a rebuilt trading engine, upgraded smart contracts, and a new collateral token (Polymarket USD) as we phase out USDC.e. — Polymarket (@Polymarket) April 6, 2026 Over the next two to three weeks, the event contract exchange will revamp its core infrastructure to boost execution speed, reduce gas costs, and build a more streamlined technical foundation for future development. The most noticeable change for the platform’s regular users will be the transition from USDC.e to Polymarket USD, which the company confirms is backed 1:1 by USDC. Put simply, Polymarket will replace the token users submit as collateral with its own USDC wrapper, while also upgrading the behind-the-scenes trade matching system. Most front-end adjustments will be processed automatically, the company noted. However, open orders will be canceled for a short window during the maintenance period, which will be announced at least one week in advance. What the Upgrade Actually Entails From a technical standpoint, Polymarket is launching CTF Exchange V2 and an updated iteration of its central limit order book, or CLOB. For those unfamiliar with the crypto space, these changes essentially translate to faster trade matching, lower transaction fees, and updated infrastructure for bots, apps, and other tools that connect to the exchange. The company also noted the new tech stack will support EIP-1271 signatures, a change that is expected to simplify interactions between smart contract wallets and the platform. The upgrades extend beyond the retail trading experience. In an X post explaining the update, Polymarket Developers stated API traders, bot operators, and other integrators will need to update their software development kits and re-sign orders using the new system structure. TypeScript, Python, and Go clients are expected to be available ahead of launch day, while migration documentation and a full API changelog will be released at a later date. Upgrade Follows a Series of Infrastructure-Related Deals Polymarket’s April 6 announcement comes on the heels of several moves the company made in early 2026 to strengthen the technical infrastructure supporting its exchange. The firm has spent the past few months building out its core technology via a series of acquisitions and major funding rounds. February 19: Polymarket purchased Dome, a Y Combinator-backed startup focused on unified API infrastructure, to simplify market data access for third-party tools. March 18: The company acquired Brahma, a DeFi infrastructure specialist, to enhance wallet creation, cross-chain operations, and token redemption processes. March 27: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent entity of the New York Stock Exchange, finalized a $600 million direct cash investment in Polymarket. This followed ICE’s $1 billion investment in the platform in late 2025. As Polymarket integrates these specialized technologies and secures substantial institutional backing, it is increasingly positioning itself as far more than a standard betting platform. The new infrastructure provides Polymarket with the core trading “plumbing” it needs to reduce its dependence on third-party providers, enabling it to build a more stable, scalable environment as it continues its CFTC-regulated re-entry into the U.S. market. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - The four Wabanaki tribes in Maine have submitted a legal motion in response to a lawsuit by Oxford Casino Hotel, which aims to prevent the tribes from debuting online casino platforms. Following Maine's legalization of tribal-led online casinos earlier this year, Oxford Casino filed a suit against the state, characterizing the legislation as an unlawful “race-based monopoly.” A judge has approved a joint request to intervene in the case filed last week by all four Wabanaki tribes: the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, the Mi’kmaq Nation, the Passamaquoddy Tribe, and the Penobscot Nation. Does Tribal Exclusivity Constitute Racial Discrimination? In its January filing, the casino argued that “advancing iGaming through race-based preferences is a significant blow to Maine companies like Oxford Casino,” noting their substantial investments in the state. The casino further asserts that the introduction of online casinos could result in the loss of 378 jobs, $22 million in labor earnings, and $60 million in total economic value for Maine. Rejecting the allegation of racial favoritism, the tribes maintain that their exclusive gaming privileges are rooted in their status as sovereign political entities. Legal counsel for the tribes stated that “accepting the Plaintiffs’ equal protection arguments could jeopardize numerous laws that are based on the distinct sovereign status of federally recognized tribes.” The tribes currently hold exclusive rights to sports wagering, which debuted in 2023. However, this sector has faced opposition from the tribes regarding the emergence of sports prediction markets. Tribal Empowerment Through Online Casino Revenue Although Maine Governor Janet Mills was initially hesitant to legalize online casinos, she ultimately approved the measure to support tribal development. Mills remarked, “I have consistently aimed to collaborate with Tribal leaders to enhance the prosperity of the Wabanaki Nations, and I hope this new funding source achieves that goal.” Market experts estimate that iGaming could produce $100 million to $200 million in yearly revenue. From this, commercial partners DraftKings and Caesars, who manage tribal sports betting, could see $20 million to $30 million. Oxford Casino Argues Limited Benefits for Maine State tax forecasts suggest roughly $1.8 million in revenue during the first year, increasing to approximately $3.6 million the following year. Oxford Casino contends these tax figures do not justify the market's expansion and points to a poll showing that 65% of Maine residents are against online casinos. The complaint argues that there is no "compelling government interest" in prioritizing the financial welfare of the Wabanaki Nations over other state entities and citizens. Lenny Powell, representing the Wabanaki Nations via the Native American Rights Fund, noted that evidence indicates “both tribal and nontribal communities benefit when Tribal nations are granted the power of self-determination.” The legal challenge aims for a ruling that the law violates Maine's rules against special legislation and seeks an injunction. If the law stands, the first sites could launch next year. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.

(AsiaGameHub) - Kalshi has secured a significant legal victory in the Third Circuit in New Jersey. The judges affirmed a prior decision to grant the company a preliminary injunction in its legal dispute with the state's gambling regulator. While this ruling does not definitively settle the legality of sports prediction markets, Dustin Gouker, a prominent industry analyst, described it as “the most important ruling to date concerning the legality of prediction markets and whether federal law supersedes state gaming regulations.” Gouker first reported this development in his newsletter, The Event Horizon, noting that two out of the three judges ruled in favor of Kalshi. In their written decision, the judges stated, “Kalshi was likely to succeed in demonstrating that the (Commodity Exchange) Act preempts New Jersey law from interfering with Kalshi’s CFTC-licensed DCM to prohibit sports-related event contracts.” Case Background New Jersey was among the initial states to challenge Kalshi regarding its sports markets, issuing the company a cease-and-desist letter in April of the previous year. In response, Kalshi initiated a lawsuit against the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (NJDGE) and the Casino Control Commission. Subsequently, a judge granted Kalshi a preliminary injunction, which halted the enforcement of the cease-and-desist order. New Jersey appealed this decision to the Third Circuit, but the judges ultimately upheld the original ruling. Implications for Sports Prediction Markets For the present, this judgment permits Kalshi to continue offering its sports markets within New Jersey. It is also anticipated that Kalshi will leverage this decision in other legal challenges across the nation. Concurrently, rulings in other states have been issued that Kalshi's adversaries are utilizing to bolster their arguments. Similar to New Jersey, Nevada initially granted Kalshi an injunction but later reversed its decision. This state is the sole jurisdiction that has successfully imposed restrictions on Kalshi's markets. In a court filing submitted in New Jersey last week, Kalshi pointed out that the ruling in Nevada was made without a hearing. The company's legal team also argued that imposing restrictions on federally regulated exchanges would lead to “complete chaos,” rendering platforms unable to provide equitable access to all eligible participants nationwide. CFTC Supports Kalshi The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) submitted an amicus brief in support of Kalshi and has reaffirmed its position that it possesses exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts. The commission has further defended Kalshi and other platforms by filing lawsuits against state regulators in Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois. The New Jersey ruling strengthens the cases for both the CFTC and Kalshi, though the legal battle is far from over. Gouker commented, “New Jersey could request an en banc rehearing in the Third Circuit, where all the judges in the circuit would hear the case. It could also appeal to the US Supreme Court.” The Supreme Court is likely to be the venue where the legal standing of sports prediction markets will be determined. Legal experts anticipate this will occur within the next few years, potentially as early as next year. As with many matters, trading on these markets is available on prediction market platforms. Polymarket currently indicates a 60% probability that the Supreme Court will hear a case by the end of the year. This article is provided by a third-party. AsiaGameHub (https://asiagamehub.com/) makes no warranties regarding its content. AsiaGameHub delivers targeted distribution for iGaming, Casino, and eSports, connecting 3,000+ premium Asian media outlets and 80,000+ specialized influencers across ASEAN.